Converting Ball Grid Array to Column Grid Array
The body content of your post goes here. To edit this text, click on it and delete this default text and start typing your own or paste your own from a different source.
Introduction
- The availability of Military-grade electronics is declining
- Ball Grid Array (BGA) is rapidly becoming the package style of choice in commercial electronics
- For Military and Space environments, BGA packaging is a reliability compromise (BGAs lack compliant leads)
- Modifications and ruggedization of packaging is essential for ensuring reliability of military electronics 4
The Problem
- Solder balls are less compliant than leads
- Stress is induced by:
- Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) mismatch (temperature cycle)
- Thermal mismatch (power cycle)
- Mechanical (warp, vibration, etc)
- Stress increases with:
- Distance from neutral point (larger packages)
- Lower standoff height
BGA vs. CGA
- Column Grid Array (CGA) is a flexible interconnect replacement for rigid solder balls
- Higher standoff and compliance in the column alleviates CTE and thermal mismatch between the board and the component
The CGA Solution
- ΔT 1 = Temperature Change of Board
- ΔT 2 = Temperature Change of Component
- α 1 = CTE of the Board
- α 2 = CTE of the Component
- S = Distance from Neutral Point (DNP)
- E = Modulus of Elasticity of Ball or Column
- d = Diameter of Ball or Column
- L = Standoff Height of Ball or Column
- σ max = Maximum Stress
Types of Columns
Wire Column
High-Lead wire attached with Sn63-Pb37 fillets
Reinforced Solder Column
High-Lead wire core with spiral wrapped copper ribbon attached with Sn63-Pb37 fillets
Benefits of the Reinforced Column
Straight Wire Column
- Finite element model showing location of maximum strain (Left)
- Typical failure of non-reinforced column (Right)
Copper Reinforced Column
- Crack propagation abated
- Redundancy without stiffness
- Continues to function electrically even if core is cracked
Test Results
Temperature Cycles –10 to +125 C All parts ceramic with 1.27mm pitch 625 pin package 32mm square
- CBGA625 | BGA with high-Pb spheres
- CCGA625 | CGA with straight wire columns
- CCGA625R | CGA with reinforced columns
Conclusion
- Many commercial components are not capable of meeting the environmental requirements of military and space applications
- CGA modifications to commercial devices result in
- Reliability Improvements
- Robust Designs
- Reinforced solder columns show a significant performance advantage in comparison to other solder columns
Future Work
- Military funding of this technology will allow significant improvements such as:
- Optimize column design through finite element modeling and analysis of the reinforced column
- Reliability testing and qualification of enhancements in design and materials
- Development of a lead-free version
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Tom Clifford - Lockheed Martin and William Davis - Applied Material Technologies for their valuable analysis, discussions, and helpful input.
Bibliography
[1] D. Banks, D. Gerke, “Assembly and Reliability of Ceramic Column Grid Array
[2] A. Perkins, S. Sitaraman, “Thermo-mechanical Failure Comparison and Evaluation of CCGA and CBGA Packages
[3] T. Clifford, “Final Report – Phase 1 T-Cycle Test” Lockheed Martin Internal Document
[4] R. Winslow, “Converting Ball Grid Array Components to Column Grid Array” MASH 2005

